Myths about ADN Programs and Graduates

Watch out my lovely readers. I have spunk today, and I think I know where I got it from. I’m rockin’ a bold new haircut, and it’s rubbing off on my writing. So prepare yourself for spunk. Lots. Of. It.

IMG_20141025_103857

There are a lot of people out there that don’t understand the Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) program. I can’t tell you how many times I have heard that to pursue an associate degree after receiving a bachelor’s degree is moving backwards. Let me tell you this:  I am moving forward, I am pursuing more, I learn new things every day, and this path is the right one for me. So please listen more and judge less.

Nursing programs are not like a lot of other programs, so I can understand why the whole thing is confusing to people. There are so many routes to becoming an RN, and it’s nearly impossible to know all of them. You can go straight for the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN). Sweet! Or how about becoming an LPN first and then becoming an RN? That sounds good, right? Sure! Paramedic to RN? Right on. Teacher to ADN to RN? You rock, too!

Well, my choices eventually led me to the ADN route, and I am here to dispel some of the myths about that particular path. There are a few of them, and they are obviously misguided!

Myth #1. “So, you only have to go to school for two years, right?” Have you noticed that I don’t call ADN programs two year programs? Well, that is because ADN programs take longer than two years to complete. Say what? Yep, you heard me right. ADN programs require pre-requisites to get into the nursing specific courses. And they aren’t easy either.

The college I attend required seven communication credits, microbiology, anatomy and physiology 1 and 2, developmental psychology, medical terminology. and biomedical ethics. That’ll take you at least a year.

Also, students that attend a university (BSN program) are not spending all four years learning about nursing, so to think that they have two more years of nursing knowledge is nonsense. They take general education courses just like all of the other students attending a university. Most of those courses have little to do with nursing. I am still trying to figure out how Latin American History would have worked into a career as a dietitian.

And since nursing school is highly competitive these days, many students (including me) have previous degrees and have taken insane amounts of science courses such as genetics, organic chemistry, biology, biochemistry, pathology, and many other nightmare-ish sciences.

So do ADN graduates go to school for only two years? Ha! That’s comical.

Myth #2. “It must not be an RN program if you will be done in two years.” First of all, do I need to remind you about myth number one? It’ll take more than two years. I guarantee it.

Second of all, ADN graduates and BSN graduates sit for the exact same boards. It is the exact same hideous, straight from the pit of hell, yucky, puke-y test. I even heard that the ADN NCLEX test has the same amount of select all that apply questions. Pure evilness.

Back to my point though. If the BSN graduate passes the NCLEX exam, he or she will be an RN. And if I pass, I will be an RN.

Myth #3. “ADN graduates are not prepared to be RNs.” Let’s be honest. Is anyone fully prepared to take on the complexities of human life right after taking the NCLEX? Because that is exactly what RNs do. They have to know, through head knowledge or instinct, when something is not right and then act on it. New ADN and BSN graduates may have SOME head knowledge (but we are always learning, right?) and a itsy-bitsy-teeny-tiny amount of nursing instinct.

It is pretty unrealistic to expect an educational institution to teach you absolutely everything you need to know before you graduate. However, I DO believe that my ADN program is giving me the tools to someday be a competent nurse, and I am very grateful for that! I will have over 500 hours of direct patient-care experience by the time I graduate in May. I will know the basics, and I will know where to find answers if I have questions.

So wherever you are right now, whether it’s in a BSN program, an ADN program, an MSN program, waiting on your acceptance letter, or WHEREVER else, don’t judge another’s path. Try to understand it, but don’t judge. Be where you are and keep learning.

 

Advertisements

NCLEX Book Review

Hey y’all! It’s been a wild month, and some day I might elaborate on that. But for now, I am just glad it is over.

I had two exams so far this semester, and I want to tell you all about a book I purchased that has helped me prepare for the exams. The book is Mosby’s Comprehensive Review of Nursing for the NCLEX-RN Examination, and I am kind of in love. And just so you know…they did not pay me to say these things. Mosby’s probably doesn’t even know I exist.

IMG_3155

The book is broken down into units and sub-units. I am going to lead you through the Childbearing and Women’s Health Nursing unit to give you an idea of what this review book has to offer.

IMG_3163

Each unit is broken up into categories, such as the prenatal period, intrapartum period, and postpartum period. And each category includes sub-categories that explore complications, assessments, etc.

What I like about the review section of this book is that it gives you the important information in a concise and organized manner. After you have studied all you can from your lecture recordings, notes, and book, this is a great tool to turn to for a quick review.

IMG_3162

It has great pictures and diagrams, too!

After I review the content, I can answer NCLEX-style questions directly related to the content I am being tested on by my nursing program. So, if my test covers the prenatal period but not complications during the prenatal period, I can choose to only answer questions about the uncomplicated prenatal period. Pretty cool, huh?!

IMG_3167

The last positive note I want to make about this book is that the rationales are actual rationales! You know what I mean! How many times have you read the rationales in an NCLEX study book and realized that the rationale is just a restatement of the answer? It’s unhelpful and just plain pathetic. Mosby’s is not like that. The rationales are actual explanations! What?! No way!

The only beef I have with this book is that the answers are not on the same page as the questions. Instead of putting the answers in a column right next to the questions, you have to continually flip back and forth while reviewing the answers and rationales. Not a HUGE deal, but this book would be absolutely perfect if they would make this change.

IMG_3169

I’m so ecstatic about this book, I might just do my first giveaway. Stay tuned for details. In the meantime, I want to know your stand-by books or tools for intense exam cramming (not that we ever cram for exams, right?). 😉